Psychology Shizzle.

Hummus —

I'm just using this post to learn. 


You can stop reading if you like.


Cause I will make no sense to you at all. 


Unless you're TPOS/Psychology student/Ex-Psychology student.


-


Triplett – Fishing reel


Zajonc – Cockroaches


Michaels – Pool players


Asch – Lines


Perrin & Spencer – Young offenders


Perrin & Spencer – Repeat 40 years later


Gerard et al – Private answer


Jenness – Beans in jar


Sheriff – Light moving


Milgram – Voltage 65%


Bickman – Clothing 40>80%


Hofling – Nurses 21/22


Adorno – Authoritarian personality


Hyman & Sheatsly – Poor education


Kilhem & Mann – 16% female, 40% male


Hamilton – Personal responsibility


Oliner – Jews, empathy


Baurmind – Lack of consent, deception, harm in Milgram


-


Gestalt law of Pragnanz


Navon- Part whole principle


Rubins Vase/Neckers Cube


Ponzo – Converging & Muller-Lyer – Arrow


Gibson – Data driven, line, shadow, texture, affordances


Gregory – Knowledge of world, beliefs, experience, expectation


Neisser- Both are right, depends on situation


Bower- Infants & Perceiving distance


Gilchrist & Nesburg – Motivation, Hunger- colour and brightness


Bruner & Mintern – Expectation, 13 number v. B letter


McGuinnies – Emotion, Recognition of offensive words


Seagall et all – Cuture, Western more susceptible to ML illusion


-


Watson & Raynor – Little Albert


DiNardo – Bites from dogs


Lang & Lazovik – Phobia of snake Systematic desensitisation


Freud – Little Hans


Eysenck – Psychodynamic 44, Eclectic 64, None 66


Barlow- No purpose behind rituals


Gilbert – OCD patients bigger thalmi, Drugs reduce size


Salloway & Duffy – Increased activity in OFC


Pauls – 10% relative, 2% general population


Julien – Drugs 50-80%


Dougherty –Surgery32%


Cottreaux – Similar between EPR and Cog Therapy, after year EPR better


-


The vastness of the mind in comprehending all this.


In a short space of time.


Under pressure.


You — Fri, 31 May 2013 - 21:14

(I almost deleted the blog based on that comment. then realised it wasnt spam...)


_Me_ — Fri, 31 May 2013 - 21:30

If you don't delete it the spammer will think its OK to post offensive stuff like this again. 


_Me_ — Fri, 31 May 2013 - 21:51

And its offensive because not everyone can understand what its about. It's discriminating intelligence. 


_Me_ — Tue, 7 Jan 2014 - 22:28

Thankyou very much for creating this blog. 


 


PS. Calling it spam seemed appropriate at the time. 


😛


Hummus — Wed, 8 Jan 2014 - 11:22

Spoke too soon, eh? 😛


I don't know how much sense it will make to you because those were just very and i mean VERY "brief" notes summing up all the case studies I needed to know. When I went through each one, I'd say out aloud everything I knew about it with all the statistics just by the hint that I had given myself. Alhamdulillah it helped me a lot!


Hummus — Mon, 10 Feb 2014 - 22:02

Yeah course I did! All of them. Paid off greatly to be honest.


But now if you ask me, I won't remember lol.